Importance of the Results Section in Academic Papers.
The results section of our paper announces the key findings of our own paper. The discussion section attempts to compare and contrast the findings with the available literature. And the conclusion.
The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound understanding of the research problem under.
The results section (or findings section) reports the results of the study. For example, if the research involved a large quantitative survey, the results section would include information about how many people completed the survey, basic information describing those people, and statistical analysis of the answers given in the survey.
In your discussion you must draw together your research question and your own research results. If the discussion is in a self-contained chapter or section you will need to briefly summarise the major findings that come from the research and relate them to what you originally proposed to find out.
Results Section. The Results section should set out your key experimental results, including any statistical analysis and whether or not the results of these are significant. You should cover any literature supporting your interpretation of significance. It does not have to include everything you did, particularly for a doctorate dissertation.
Results section according to what the survey found, using headings like these: 2. Results and Discussion 2.1 Frequency of recycling 2.2 Reasons for not recycling 2.3 Ways to improve recycling 4.3.1 Choose appropriate type of headings There are two types of headings: talking and topic headings. Talking headings present a certain point of view whilst topic headings list only the topic to be.
A Sample APA Paper: The Efficacy of Psychotheraputic Interventions with Profoundly Deceased Patients Jeff Aspelmeier Radford University Acknowledgments: Many parts of this paper were unabashedly ripped off from course materials developed by Dr. John Rosenkoetter that were presented to me when I took research methods with John (we will not discuss how long ago that was). The absurdity of the.